|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Whaley, Luke; Water Science Institute, Cranfield University; l.whaley@cranfield.ac.uk; Weatherhead, Edward K.; Water Science Institute, Cranfield University; k.weatherhead@cranfield.ac.uk. |
| Scholars of comanagement are faced with a difficult methodological challenge. As comanagement has evolved and diversified it has increasingly merged with the field of adaptive management and related concepts that derive from resilience thinking and complex adaptive systems theory. In addition to earlier considerations of power sharing, institution building, and trust, the adaptive turn in comanagement has brought attention to the process of social learning and a focus on concepts such as scale, self-organization, and system trajectory. At the same time, a number of scholars are calling for a more integrated approach to studying (adaptive) comanagement that is able to situate these normative concepts within a critical understanding of how context and power... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Synthesis |
Palavras-chave: Comanagement; Adaptive comanagement; IAD Framework; Politicized IAD Framework; Methodology; Institutions; Power; Discourse; Resilience. |
| Ano: 2014 |
|
| |
|
|
| Wittmer, Heidi; Birner, Regina. |
| The present paper analyzes the role of discourse in conflicts concerning nature conservation in tropical countries. We focus on the contested question as to whether and to which extent local communities should be allowed to live and use resources inside protected areas. Applying the concepts of belief-systems, story-lines and discourse coalitions, we analyze two empirical case studies dealing with this conflict: The first case study is concerned with a policy process at the national level that aimed at passing a community forestry law in Thailand to make the establishment of community forests in protected areas possible. The second case study deals with the proposed resettlement of a village from the Lore Lindu National Park in Sulawesi, Indonesia. In both... |
| Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper |
Palavras-chave: Discourse; Biodiversity conservation; Protected area management; Resource /Energy Economics and Policy. |
| Ano: 2005 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/42490 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Di Gregorio, Monica; University of Leeds, Sustainability Research Institute; m.digregorio@leeds.ac.uk; Brockhaus, Maria; Center for International Forestry Research; m.brockhaus@cgiar.org; Cronin, Tim; WWF Australia; timpcronin@hotmail.com; Muharrom, Efrian ; Center for International Forestry Research; e.muharrom@cgiar.org; Santoso, Levania; Center for International Forestry Research; l.santoso@cgiar.org; Mardiah, Sofi; Center for International Forestry Research; s.mardiah@cgiar.org. |
| Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) is primarily a market-based mechanism for achieving the effective reduction of carbon emissions from forests. Increasingly, however, concerns are being raised about the implications of REDD+ for equity, including the importance of equity for achieving effective carbon emission reductions from forests. Equity is a multifaceted concept that is understood differently by different actors and at different scales, and public discourse helps determine which equity concerns reach the national policy agenda. Results from a comparative media analysis of REDD+ public discourse in four countries show that policy makers focus more on international than national equity concerns, and that they neglect... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Comparative analysis; Discourse; Equity; Media analysis; Mitigation; REDD+. |
| Ano: 2013 |
|
| |
|
|
| Milne, Sarah; Crawford School of Public Policy, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University; sarah.milne@anu.edu.au; Milne, Mary; Crawford School of Public Policy, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University; milne_mary@hotmail.com; Nurfatriani, Fitri; Research and Development Centre of Social Economic Policy and Climate Change, Ministry of Environment and Forestry Indonesia; nurfatriani@yahoo.com; Tacconi, Luca; Crawford School of Public Policy, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University; luca.tacconi@anu.edu.au. |
| The implementation of “reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation” (REDD+) will inevitably be affected by local social and political dynamics, with the potential for success depending significantly on cooperation from a range of stakeholders at the subnational level. Building on recent critical research on REDD+, we look at how global policy is interpreted locally by actors who are likely to be involved in REDD+ implementation. We do this by examining local stakeholder perceptions of REDD+ and forest management in two contrasting provinces of Indonesia, Riau and Papua, where deforestation rates are high and low, respectively. Using data collected from stakeholder workshops, we conduct a discourse analysis that reveals... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Deforestation; Discourse; Environmental politics; Indonesia; REDD+. |
| Ano: 2016 |
|
| |
|
|
|
